Support for Intel platforms AUX port functionality to connect to.Why would anyone pick mac os server unless running a mac shop?Windows 7 and early version of Windows 10. Supported Mac OS X versions: 10.5 Leopard, 10.4 Tiger, 10.3 Panther and 10.2 Jaguar. LogMeIn Pro features file storage with an initial 1TB of. This remote computer access application gives businesses a way to access their desktop files from any device, even mobile devices. Although LogMeIn discontinued its free version in 2014, the paid alternative called LogMeIn Pro is one of the best remote desktop tools for Mac on the market.Both linux and windows run on myriad hardware choices.It is only 32 bit. Cheetah, Microsoft Windows 8, Microsoft Windows 8.1, Apple Mac OS X 10.4.It can only run on exxpensive and proprietary hardware. This assistant updates your system settings to enable remote access, ensures your computer is awake for connections, and checks that your firewall allows Remote Desktop connections.RAM: 1 GB Operating Systems: Microsoft Windows 10, Apple Mac OS 8.Sounds like windows 95 to me.As for apple remote desktop at $299 for 10 cals or $499 for unlimited, that functionality is built into windows xp pro and server 2003 oses for free. Hey lets format our server and start from scratch annually. Windows small biz server 2003 starts at about $430 for the standard edition with 5 cals.Educated and trained system admins are harder to come by versus linux and windows.“it also means never having to troll the net for drivers” i know, such a difficult task for server admins to figure out how to get video card drivers.“Though Mac OS X 10.3 Server is Apple’s tightest release to date, users should eschew upgrade installs and start clean to avoid tempting the bug gods” yet apple releases a new os point release on average every 12 months. Various other options abound based on need and scalability requirements.
When compared to an equivalent hardware platform (64 bit UNIX platform) the pricing is really reasonable.>it is only 32 bit. Just cause they can run on the road doesn’t mean they’re in the same class. You’re comparing mack trucks to a pinto. >both linux and windows run on myriad hardware choices.Look at IBM eServer 325’s or SUN unix boxes. ![]() Hey >lets format our server and start from scratch annually. However, all interactions of hardware should be accounted for with a closed hardware source, unlike windows.>”Though Mac OS X 10.3 Server is Apple’s tightest release >to date, users should eschew upgrade installs and start >clean to avoid tempting the bug gods” yet apple releases >a new os point release on average every 12 months. Or even the Intellistation A Pro.>educated and trained system admins are harder to come by >versus linux and windows.Certified mcse’s are not always educated, and most linux skills will directly correlate to OS X.>”it also means never having to troll the net for drivers” >i know, such a difficult task for server admins to figure >out how to get video card drivers.I agree it shouldn’t be a problem with quality hardware. Try redhat advanced server or enterprise serverTry prices on Solaris, or again IBM eServer 325. Windows small biz >server 2003 starts at about $430 for the standard edition >with 5 cals.Try rating Windows 2003 advanced server with exchange, sql, etc. Various other options abound based >on need and scalability requirements. You can say bottom of the barrel Intel with linux/windows is cheaper, or Top of the line Linux/Windows/Sun/whatever is more scalable, but in the midrange server market, Xserves are awesome. For comparable hardware, software and support, Apple is very reasonable. Even IBM with Linux is not a cheap solution. As a UNIX vendor, they’re prices are sooo much more reasonable than say SUN. So add that to >bottom line of apples cost…on top of already over >priced hardware and the price tag just keeps going up.Never used remote desktop, but based on all their other software, I would say it’s probably pretty good, and if you don’t like it, use vnc, or ssh that comes out of the box.>we dont even need to go into the lack of features in mac >os x server…Have you ever used OS X? Apache? Bind? SSH? FTP? LDAP? Good administration tools? not to mention you can install fink, darwin ports, the new gentoo, and have almost any UNIX software you want.>nor do we need to discuss the paltry selection of third >party solutions and add ons for the os.You really have to do fair comparisons. I have never done a major upgrade on Windows server, or OS X, but I would imagine it’s a pretty similar process.>as for apple remote desktop at $299 for 10 cals or $499 >for unlimited, that functionality is built into windows >xp pro and server 2003 oses for free. Panther Remote Access For Pc Trial Quality ComparableWhats your point? apache with unlimited clients runs on a $349 emachine with windows or a $200 linux box too?“$360 bucks for the W2k3 Web Server edition doesn’t even get you one single, solitary CAL.”I said: “windows server 2003 web edition with unlimited web access starts at about $360”“Client access licenses (CALs) do not apply to Windows Server 2003, Web Edition.”So why even bring up the point about cals for a webserver?“Add on top of that 4 grand for W2k3 with 25 CALS and you’re already getting shafted.”See windows server pricing below, but you can use linux on your x86 hardware with unlimited cals for FREE.“And Apple Remote Desktop is nothing like what you get free with XP Pro. A 5, 10, or 20 person workgroup doesnt need a dual cpu server for basic file, print, backup chores….a dual xeon or athlon mp or opteron with small biz server 2003 premium scales to 75 users with power to spare.64 bit hardware and a 64 bit os are different are they not?“Even an $700 eMac can have unlimited web clients.”Well considering they are just distributing an open source product, apache, that doesn’t surprise me. I would agree if you said their desktop tower offerings are expensive, but in the server and laptop markets they have very competitive pricing.”An xserve is not competitive for small biz when they can buy servers for one third the price that do what they need. I like Linux and BSD, but to get comparable support, they’re no longer free.“once you get into hardware options and industrial quality comparable to XServes your paying a lot no matter who you go with. Offline netflix for macThey are server oriented and are free on windows server 2003.As for windows server pricing (all readily available via osnews pricegrabber or pricewatch or froogle)(licensing options bring prices down even lower via negotiations with ms or a reseller):Windows small business server 2003 standard edition with 5 cals (includes exchange and outlook that the above so dearly wish apple had a solution for) $397 …. Not many xp pro users are looking for those features. Its added power is free in the server os, not xp pro. But i specifically mentioned that the functionality of apple’s remote desktop was built into windows server 2003. Yes xp pro remote desktop is a simple client and or server…it does both. I said “as for apple remote desktop at $299 for 10 cals or $499 for unlimited, that functionality is built into windows xp pro and server 2003 oses for free.”When folks comment on things on here we assume you can read and understand the material yourself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorDavid ArchivesCategories |